//
//  Generated code. Do not modify.
//  source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto
//
// @dart = 3.3

// ignore_for_file: annotate_overrides, camel_case_types, comment_references
// ignore_for_file: constant_identifier_names, library_prefixes
// ignore_for_file: non_constant_identifier_names, prefer_final_fields
// ignore_for_file: unnecessary_import, unnecessary_this, unused_import

import 'dart:core' as $core;

import 'package:protobuf/protobuf.dart' as $pb;
import 'package:protobuf/src/protobuf/mixins/well_known.dart' as $mixin;

export 'package:protobuf/protobuf.dart' show GeneratedMessageGenericExtensions;

///  `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
///
///      paths: "f.a"
///      paths: "f.b.d"
///
///  Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
///  fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
///  message in `f.b`.
///
///  Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
///  returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
///  Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
///
///  # Field Masks in Projections
///
///  When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
///  sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
///  specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
///  example is applied to a response message as follows:
///
///      f {
///        a : 22
///        b {
///          d : 1
///          x : 2
///        }
///        y : 13
///      }
///      z: 8
///
///  The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
///  (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
///  output):
///
///
///      f {
///        a : 22
///        b {
///          d : 1
///        }
///      }
///
///  A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
///  paths string.
///
///  If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
///  operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
///  had been specified).
///
///  Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
///  top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
///  field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
///  list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
///  in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
///  other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
///  clearly documented together with its declaration in the API.  In
///  any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
///  behavior for APIs.
///
///  # Field Masks in Update Operations
///
///  A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
///  targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
///  to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
///  and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
///  describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
///  fields not covered by the mask.
///
///  If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
///  be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
///  a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
///
///  If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
///  update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
///  in the target resource.
///
///  For example, given the target message:
///
///      f {
///        b {
///          d: 1
///          x: 2
///        }
///        c: [1]
///      }
///
///  And an update message:
///
///      f {
///        b {
///          d: 10
///        }
///        c: [2]
///      }
///
///  then if the field mask is:
///
///   paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
///
///  then the result will be:
///
///      f {
///        b {
///          d: 10
///          x: 2
///        }
///        c: [1, 2]
///      }
///
///  An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
///  repeated and message fields.
///
///  In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
///  be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
///  Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
///  instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
///  not provide a mask as described below.
///
///  If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
///  all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
///  Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
///  fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
///  the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
///  behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
///  a field mask, producing an error if not.
///
///  As with get operations, the location of the resource which
///  describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
///  operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
///  required to be honored by the API.
///
///  ## Considerations for HTTP REST
///
///  The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
///  be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
///  (PUT must only be used for full updates).
///
///  # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
///
///  In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
///  separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
///  to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
///
///  As an example, consider the following message declarations:
///
///      message Profile {
///        User user = 1;
///        Photo photo = 2;
///      }
///      message User {
///        string display_name = 1;
///        string address = 2;
///      }
///
///  In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
///
///      mask {
///        paths: "user.display_name"
///        paths: "photo"
///      }
///
///  In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
///
///      {
///        mask: "user.displayName,photo"
///      }
///
///  # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
///
///  Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
///  following message:
///
///      message SampleMessage {
///        oneof test_oneof {
///          string name = 4;
///          SubMessage sub_message = 9;
///        }
///      }
///
///  The field mask can be:
///
///      mask {
///        paths: "name"
///      }
///
///  Or:
///
///      mask {
///        paths: "sub_message"
///      }
///
///  Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
///  paths.
///
///  ## Field Mask Verification
///
///  The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
///  request should verify the included field paths, and return an
///  `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is unmappable.
class FieldMask extends $pb.GeneratedMessage with $mixin.FieldMaskMixin {
  factory FieldMask({
    $core.Iterable<$core.String>? paths,
  }) {
    final $result = create();
    if (paths != null) {
      $result.paths.addAll(paths);
    }
    return $result;
  }
  FieldMask._() : super();
  factory FieldMask.fromBuffer($core.List<$core.int> i, [$pb.ExtensionRegistry r = $pb.ExtensionRegistry.EMPTY]) => create()..mergeFromBuffer(i, r);
  factory FieldMask.fromJson($core.String i, [$pb.ExtensionRegistry r = $pb.ExtensionRegistry.EMPTY]) => create()..mergeFromJson(i, r);

  static final $pb.BuilderInfo _i = $pb.BuilderInfo(_omitMessageNames ? '' : 'FieldMask', package: const $pb.PackageName(_omitMessageNames ? '' : 'google.protobuf'), createEmptyInstance: create, toProto3Json: $mixin.FieldMaskMixin.toProto3JsonHelper, fromProto3Json: $mixin.FieldMaskMixin.fromProto3JsonHelper)
    ..pPS(1, _omitFieldNames ? '' : 'paths')
    ..hasRequiredFields = false
  ;

  @$core.Deprecated(
  'Using this can add significant overhead to your binary. '
  'Use [GeneratedMessageGenericExtensions.deepCopy] instead. '
  'Will be removed in next major version')
  FieldMask clone() => FieldMask()..mergeFromMessage(this);
  @$core.Deprecated(
  'Using this can add significant overhead to your binary. '
  'Use [GeneratedMessageGenericExtensions.rebuild] instead. '
  'Will be removed in next major version')
  FieldMask copyWith(void Function(FieldMask) updates) => super.copyWith((message) => updates(message as FieldMask)) as FieldMask;

  $pb.BuilderInfo get info_ => _i;

  @$core.pragma('dart2js:noInline')
  static FieldMask create() => FieldMask._();
  FieldMask createEmptyInstance() => create();
  static $pb.PbList<FieldMask> createRepeated() => $pb.PbList<FieldMask>();
  @$core.pragma('dart2js:noInline')
  static FieldMask getDefault() => _defaultInstance ??= $pb.GeneratedMessage.$_defaultFor<FieldMask>(create);
  static FieldMask? _defaultInstance;

  /// The set of field mask paths.
  @$pb.TagNumber(1)
  $pb.PbList<$core.String> get paths => $_getList(0);
}


const _omitFieldNames = $core.bool.fromEnvironment('protobuf.omit_field_names');
const _omitMessageNames = $core.bool.fromEnvironment('protobuf.omit_message_names');